In response to:

What's Wrong with Public Nudity?

wrigdon Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 12:54 PM
adam and eve WERE ashamed of being naked after they sinned DOESNT that tell you its wrong GOD HIMSELF killed an innocent animal to cover their nakedness and said see what you have done you have caused the shedding of innocent blood
Michael160 Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 2:01 PM
Of course God could have simply created pants out of thin air or clay or something, but he would rather kill an animal and then blame the people for it. I don't understand how anybody can a)believe in this nonsense and b)worship this nightmarish being.
rickmcq Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 2:06 PM
We can agree, Michael, that you "do not understand."
The Liberal Mind vs Facts Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 2:16 PM
Michael, you totally miss the point God was making by taking the life of an innocent animal. That is to be expected from what I've read on your posts.

You sound very angry at religion, are you by chance gay?
DCM in FL Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 2:31 PM
God is only a "nightmarish being" if you're in rebellion against him. If only more people realized how scary such a position really is.
Patriot155 Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 2:58 PM
DCM,
The problem is that people often don't realize that the "nightmares" were brought on by the actions of people who rebelled against him. Godlessness comes with bad consequences built into the acts. For example, sexual immorallity and the many diseases associated with it, many of which have no cure. God did not do this to us, we brought it on to ourselves.
Barbara1247 Wrote: Dec 05, 2012 4:48 PM
Not only that, but God - being omniscient - knew exactly what Adam and Eve were going to do. He created the serpent, knowing that it was going to tempt Eve. He created Eve, knowing that she would fall for it. He created Adam, knowing that Adam would follow Eve's lead.
Barbara1247 Wrote: Dec 05, 2012 4:50 PM
God didn't create sexually transmissible viruses?
If you want to understand Leftism -- and everyone needs to because it has been the most dynamic religion of the last one hundred years -- one good place to start is with San Francisco.

Or perhaps more precisely -- with nudity.

And even more precisely -- with public nudity.

Last month, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted by the barest (pun not intended) margin -- 6 to 5 -- to ban public nudity. By public nudity, the law refers only to displaying one's genitals in public. San Francisco women are still free to walk around topless. But that is not unique...

Related Tags: San Francisco Nudity