1 - 10 Next
That Liberals imply that equivalence exists between what ISIS/ISIL is doing and what Phil Robertson said -- even for their political parlor games -- shows the depths of their sociopathy. Liberals have reached the point where they literally no longer experience shame. American Liberalism isn't a political philosophy any more, it's a disorder. If ever there was an argument against compromise, but instead fighting to soundly defeat them at every opportunity, this is it.
Also please note that Obamacare was sold to Americans based on lies, deception, and secrecy. Millions of people can NOT "keep their insurance plan" and can NOT "keep their doctor." Also please note that your claim that Obamacare has reduced health costs calls for you to cite your source, as millions have seen premiums go up, with more increases just announced. Also please note that the purpose of this column was to illustrate the lies being told by the Obama administration regarding the Halbig lawsuit. Video evidence is usually convincing, unless one is completely blinded by partisanship.
The Gruber exposure is not surprising, nor is his reaction to getting caught. These people, these "public servants," have lied, been caught lying, and carried on as though nothing happened, again and again. The astonishing arrogance of such people is breathtaking. These are clearly individuals who have lost connection with ordinary citizens, among whom lying is bad and getting caught lying calls for contrition and apology. Ordinary people certainly don't entrust proven liars with more money or responsibility.
The recent spate of court rulings against the Obama administration show that American justice, while moving excruciatingly slowly, is still possible. If the courts continue to do their job, the Obama administration may likely be considered by future historians as the most corrupt since Warren G. Harding.
The fundamental flaw with Tanner's argument - he poses Tea Partiers as "anti immigration" when they in fact oppose *illegal* immigration. A significant point that he misrepresents, one can suppose, on purpose.
In response to:

Hillary’s Book Tour From Hell

wordkyle Wrote: Jun 15, 2014 7:10 AM
"Let's hope the American people are not that dumb." That's the funniest thing I've read in a long time.
It's notable that pundits call attention to how the Republican establishment, with control of the machinery and essentially unlimited resources, is winning "most" of its races this year...against a Tea Party movement that's barely four years old. It's like saying an NFL team is winning "most" of its games against a high school.
In response to:

Libertarians Versus Conservatives

wordkyle Wrote: Jun 11, 2014 1:14 PM
You're referring to "our trade with China" as it applies *now*. Haven't we already seen how Putin treats Europe? If they don't do what he wants diplomatically, he starts threatening their oil supply. Expand that to a future where Russia and/or China control the trade shipping lanes and also the trade policies of a number of the other countries that we trade with. Do you doubt that if in such a case the U.S. displeased them that they would use strong arm trading techniques? As I said initially, Liberals and Libertarians seem to agree that other countries will play nice if we don't provoke them. That ignores reality.
In response to:

Libertarians Versus Conservatives

wordkyle Wrote: Jun 11, 2014 7:58 AM
Stossel's argument is basically like the Liberals; i.e., If the U.S. doesn't "provoke" our enemies, then we don't need to worry about them. We've seen how a weak American military presence emboldened Russia and China to begin their expansionist ambitions. When our not-allies take over control of the majority of the world militarily because America only "defends" itself (presumably when attacked militarily?) how will that affect our ability to trade with the rest of the world? Couldn't they just squeeze us to death economically? Our recent efforts have been unsuccessful, but Stossel's argument is not the answer.
In response to:

No Landslide for the GOP

wordkyle Wrote: May 16, 2014 1:00 PM
Hugh Hewitt put it best several years ago: "If it's not close, they can't cheat."
1 - 10 Next