In response to:

Separation of Church and Home

wmou Wrote: Oct 31, 2012 10:30 AM
One of the reasons liberals want the central govt involved in most aspects of society is when the govt is involved in any way, including funding, the govt will control it. If you take govt money, you no longer have constitutional protection.
In a new low by those suffering from the belief that all things religious are like asbestos in the ceiling tiles of society, a senior living complex has denied an elderly widow the freedom to pray and talk about her faith in a common area. Why? Because the complex accepts U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development funds.

This is a wrongheaded view of “separation of church and state” on steroids. The Constitution does not create a separation of church and home.

The left has long sought to remove religions—and especially Judeo-Christian religions—from any location outside of church.