Previous 31 - 40 Next
Why does anybody want the govt to define marriage for them? It is a religious institution and the govt at all levels should not be involved.
In response to:

Church, State and The Supremes

wmou Wrote: Nov 15, 2013 10:53 AM
Yes there is.
In response to:

Church, State and The Supremes

wmou Wrote: Nov 15, 2013 8:37 AM
town councils should be free to express religious views, but not require them.
In response to:

Church, State and The Supremes

wmou Wrote: Nov 15, 2013 7:24 AM
I believe in Freedom of religious expression and Freedom from a state or federal religion. Modern liberals want to eliminate the first part using the second part as an excuse.
Other than being unconstitutional, there are dozens of reasons govt should not try to operate as a business. Without the profit motive, there is no consequence for incompetence.. The govt does not have customers, it now has subjects who must bow and obey. As predictably bad as Obamacare is, no customers have been lost. Govt subjects still MUST comply.
The vast majority of those who support banning religious expression are opposed to censorship.
If they put up the posters, we would have an established state religion. Nobody knows which religion. But in the imagination of a few SC Justices a state religion would be established.
In response to:

The Problem With Libertarians

wmou Wrote: Nov 07, 2013 5:14 PM
Eliminate Dept of education and all fed involvement in public schools. Dept of Commerce, NSA and Homeland Security, FBI, ATF and EPA can be greatly reduced.
In response to:

The Problem With Libertarians

wmou Wrote: Nov 07, 2013 5:01 PM
He can hate me if he cuts fed power and spending.
In response to:

The Problem With Libertarians

wmou Wrote: Nov 07, 2013 4:39 PM
I lean towards libertarianism, but I am more of a realist. As a conservative, I cannot mourn when most republicans lose. Republicans see a huge difference between Bush and Mr. Obama. I see little difference. Fed debt and power grows unabated, regardless which party has the power.
The principal and school would be safer with this parent in the school with or without arms. Liberals think gun laws make them safer. They would be right if criminals obeyed the law, but then they would not be criminals.
Previous 31 - 40 Next