1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Laughing On 9/11 With Joan Rivers

Wm8 Wrote: Sep 08, 2014 9:27 AM
Maybe, because she was Jewish was the reason that she honors them by having the tattoo. As to how many Russians, we would have to separate out the ones who dies from the war and the ones who Stalin murdered and counted as "war" dead. As to the Chinese, we would have to separate out the ones from the Chinese civil war that was ongoing with the war with the Japanese. With the Poles, I agree, but how do we count the ones that dies, only the ones who Russians killed or the ones who the Germans killed??? Yes, Gypsies, homosexuals, Jews, Poles, Slavs, ... were all targeted along with many others, but we only have a hard documentation that all countries hated the Jews and few stepped in to help them. Roosevelt had a ship turned away at New York that had many Jews on board that were trying to escape from Europe, but who hears about that? The gypsies and Slavs had places to run and the Jews were betrayed by all, that is why we remember them, because of the world-wide guilt.
In response to:

Beau Bergdahl’s Duty—And Ours

Wm8 Wrote: Jul 23, 2014 9:57 AM
Doesn't matter how his first name is spelled, he was a deserter, and AWOL, yet the President welcomed him back with open arms. He let his platoon, company and battalion members down by going AWOL and we lost troops trying to find this dirtball. Keep you eyes focused on the issue here, misspelling is not the issue.
Wow, what an uninformed point. The Republicans are not trying to suppress the vote, they are trying to ensure that people are voting legally. If you want to see who is trying to ensure illegal votes happen, that the dead arise to vote, and that if you are an illegal citizen of the community, county , or voting district then look no farther than the Democratic party. I know you will not research this but I try to help people see what is out there. Check the voting records for Baltimore county Maryland in the election for Governor 1994. The 1994 election for governor of Maryland was between Ellen Sauerbrey and Parris Glendening. Voter fraud charges lawsuit? Dead people voting, prisoners and out of state people voting? The 1994 election was in doubt as charges of voter fraud led to a lawsuit by the Sauerbrey campaign to overturn the election, which was ultimately unsuccessful (hardly a big surprise in a Democrat-controlled state). And let's not forget the ridiculousness of the redistricting proposal to rid Maryland of one of the last two GOP congressmen in the state. So please check your facts before you cast lies into the winds.
In response to:

"Why Do Judges Execute Innocent…Children?"

Wm8 Wrote: Apr 21, 2014 8:27 AM
Let me ask a few things here. Since you believe in abortion, then thank your lucky stars that your mother did not abort you. And if you are that lucky then think about all of the others who were and are not as lucky, who are we to be determining if they live or die? Are you like the early eugenics people who only want certain people around? If you identify with them then you must identify with the Nazi's because that is what they were doing. They were moving to the point of if you did not meet certain requirements then you would be aborted. Is that what you believe in, if so, I feel sorry for your soul.
In response to:

And the Band Plays On

Wm8 Wrote: Mar 18, 2014 10:07 AM
Giving your words back to you, " the "Ukrainian spring" of mob violence to topple dictatorial, yet stable, Arab leaders in Northern Africa (even if he was corrupt and dictatorial, not unlike what we have now in Washington) was an act of provocation--not appeasement. And not unlike the "Arab spring's" chaotic aftermath, the vacuum has been filled with extremist, anti-Semitic (That's right, JB168, anti-US, anti-Christians) are now part of the new "legitimate, democratic" governments in Egypt and Libya, also allied with the differing factions of Islamic terrorists (to include Al-Qadia). And Mr. Mubarak, wasn't he our staunch ally and a supporter of Israel, and Mr. Ghadaffi, while erratic, he was willing to work with the US and Westerners, unlike the ruling factions now in Egypt and Libya. JB168, your creative writing gift can turn dangerous in the service of knee-jerk, misplaced anachconistic anti-(fill in the blank) propaganda. Try starting with the facts, not cherry picked factoids..
In response to:

And the Band Plays On

Wm8 Wrote: Mar 18, 2014 7:58 AM
Wow, Paolo3, hypocrisy, really, supporting the "Russian" side of the story, while not understanding the true history of the area. occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan, really, that was why we had elections there in 2004, 2005, 2006... and we left Iraq in 2011 when we were supposed to. I seem to remember that Russia occupied Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldava, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, parts of Finland since WWII but no hypocrisy there right Paolo3!!! True, we need to get out of Afghanistan, and the sooner the better, but then again Russia did that first, as the USSR nad they left after ten years. The Ukraine disappeared after the Russians annexed the Crimean Khanate in 1783, the region called New Russia was settled by Ukrainian and Russian migrants. Despite the promises of Ukrainian autonomy given by the Treaty of Pereyaslav, the Ukrainian elite and the Cossacks never received the freedoms and the autonomy they were expecting from Imperial Russia. However, within the Empire, Ukrainians rose to the highest Russian state and church offices. At a later period, tsarists established a policy of Russification of Ukrainian lands, suppressing the use of the Ukrainian language in print, and in public.
2nd Amendment covers bonified US citizens, not illegal immigrants. As to minorities they should be covered already if they are citizens.
I think that you have lost your ability to reason. The Dems claim they are more moral and defend the minorities, then why are they: the ones tweeting pics of their privates all over, having illicit "sex" with interns at the WH, groping their workers and associates, but not being taken to task for it, accusing the Repubs of not being compassionate enough while attacking faith-based relief organizations, trying to force religious institutions who provide reduced cost health care to perform activities that go against their core beliefs, pointing out how if there is a "racists" crime occurs that it is only white on black crimes that count, but when black on white crime is brought up that is racist to mention it. You really need to stop watching and reading so much MSM stuff and try and study up on the issue before you post such a load of nonsense. As to starving the needy, what are you talking about, check the Presidents who provided the drought relief to Africa in the 80's and 90's, Reagan and Bush I, they also tried to ensure that it got to the truly needy but that did not happen due to Warlord intervention. As to robbing the poor, what are you talking about, if it about taxes, try again. And as to rejecting people of color, not letting them become Americans, the Repubs are all for that but doing it legally, my great-grandfather was an immigrant and he did it the way that many did before and many did after him, through the proper legal way. I also know of many African friends who took that same path. They are from Nigeria and Ghana, and became US citizens in 1992, after doing all the right things to become a citizen, and one of their questions to me was, why did President Reagan give all those illegal immigrants amnesty. Why did they not have to do what we did. My answer to them was, I do not know. So don't try and paint the Repubs as being against immigration. The Repubs are by no means immune from the stuff I mention above but there mistakes are trumpeted in the MSM while the Dems get a pass on it.
Are you looking at the same scandals all of the American people are seeing now? Benghazi, where an Ambassador was sent out to lie and mislead the American people about events that had occurred, aobut how "2" overzealous employees in the Cincinnati IRS office have n to over 35 and we now find out it has been going on over 4 years? How about the President using the Justice Department to stonewall any investigation by invoking "executive priviledge" yet when Nixon tried that he was pilloried in the press. How about level the playing field by applying the same rules to Obama and Clinton that you apply to Nixon.
Nixon was not as big a disgrace as you seem to think. Stop reading revision history and read the true facts. Nixon a criminal, for committing the ordering the FBI not to investigate a CIA action on the US soil. Sounds like a President(s) who had the FBI stonewall many investigations in the 90's and since 2009. Yet we don't talk about that. Connecting with China allowed him to work a demanded peace with Vietnam, not that it was a good peace but it was what the American people wanted.
1 - 10 Next