In response to:

How Liberals Argue: Democrats Voting Against Debt Ceiling Wasn't "Real"

wiseone Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 10:35 AM
How liberals argue. 1. They lie. 2. They change the subject. 3. They make personal attacks against their opponents instead of addressing the issue. 4. They move the target. 5. They move the goal posts 6. They exempt themselves and their friends from the standards they demand from others.
Koz'isms Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 10:55 AM
Wow, hit the nail on the head.
brimley Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 10:50 AM
fits most TH trolls to a "T"
alphonsejones Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 10:55 AM
and they always tell us that to oppose the hussein and his failed policies is done cuz we is racist's

As Guy wrote this week, liberals are arguing spending doesn't lead to deficits or more debt. During his final press conference of his first term Monday, President Obama argued that his vote against raising the debt ceiling in 2006 came at a time when things were "different," and that Republicans shouldn't be hesitating to increase the debt ceiling this time around. Yesterday on Neil Cavuto's show, Democratic Rep. Jan Schakosky argued that Democrats voting against a debt ceiling increase in 2006 wasn't "real."