In response to:

Firearm Phobes Exploit School Shooting

william704 Wrote: Dec 19, 2012 1:30 PM
I think that they're going to use Obamacare as a vehicle to establish penalties/taxes on guns and ammunition making the case that, like tanning booths and cigarettes which cause health related illnesses and thus increased costs, the physical and emotional health costs from these kinds of gun related events need to be paid for by gun owners. Then they can make the costs of owning and operating a gun so high that no one can afford them, then it will no longer be a second amendment issue, it will be a “fee” issue, and they won’t have to face supreme court challenges. Of course then they can also put a “fee” on anything and everything which they claim causes increased healthcare costs and we’re screwed.

When’s the last time you heard about a deranged gunman going on a shooting spree at a shooting range? Other than a spoof article on the Onion, a shooting range isn’t the preferred venue for a murderous shooting rampage.

Despite all of the shooters, guns and ammo, I feel safer at a shooting range than just about anywhere else. It doesn’t require expert analysis to understand why gun-free areas, not shooting ranges, are the preferred venues of those who want to murder as many victims as possible before encountering return fire.

Adam Lanza, the 20-year-old murderer of 20 young...