In response to:
We'll make this easy for you.
1. President Obama is going to hold a press conference today and admit he had the Ambassador killed because he is a Muslim and hates America.
2. He's then going to resign and make Rush Limbaugh President and Ann Coulter Vice President -- for life.
3. All the brown people in America are going to run across the borders and stay there. Any border will do. They can never come back.
4. Fox News will be only network allowed to telecast. Except Sunday's when we get the Fallwell network.
There ya go folks. Merry Christmas (in Looneyville)!
To a large group of Americans, the Benghazi story looks simple. Only the fog of politics and the media’s protection of the president obscure an ugly narrative. This article is long because the extent of denial, dissembling, and delusion is hard to describe briefly.
It’s possible, though unlikely, there are reasonable explanations for the administration’s policies leading to September 11, for the command decisions made that night, and for the government’s still-shifting stories since about all that happened.
It’s not possible there’s an honorable explanation for the national media’s dismissive refusal to press...
Ambassador Stevens was probably taken out because he knew the depth of Obama's involvement with the Muslim Brotherhood's Middle East takeover goal.
That's not to say Obama had anybody killed, just that it's a fact that Stevens was supplying weapons to Al Qaeda... in doing so, he had to work with alot of Muslim Bros, like the PM of Turkey, Endogan, and Al Qaeda leaders... Steven's had Obama's whole movie figured out... and certainly had enough to bring down a presidency...
Stevens probably caught pneumonia breathing that "fog of war".
So, what's your view? Does the article raise important questions the media is unreasonably avoiding, or does it not?