In response to:

How Liberals Argue: Democrats Voting Against Debt Ceiling Wasn't "Real"

willi4 Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 8:39 AM
Even if we manage to secure this government, we will still be unable to fix the financial problems that plague us. If we reverse the system back to the more equitable form of government our Founders established, programs like Social Security and Welfare must end. The results will be the same. Millions of dependent persons, mostly concentrated in the major metropolitan areas, will explode and civil war is the result. The big cities have been manipulated by Progressives for years to be the stronghold of the dependent masses. A private army ready to move against the US patriots.

As Guy wrote this week, liberals are arguing spending doesn't lead to deficits or more debt. During his final press conference of his first term Monday, President Obama argued that his vote against raising the debt ceiling in 2006 came at a time when things were "different," and that Republicans shouldn't be hesitating to increase the debt ceiling this time around. Yesterday on Neil Cavuto's show, Democratic Rep. Jan Schakosky argued that Democrats voting against a debt ceiling increase in 2006 wasn't "real."