In response to:

The New York Times Gets Life Support

Will352 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 1:45 PM
Canoeboy, just curious,does it hurt much,having a rancid brain?
Steve539 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 3:10 PM
ABSOLUTELY THE POST OF THE YEAR FOR ACCURACY!!! THANKS, Will352!!
Steve539 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 3:08 PM
Another Dinghy388 one liner!!!
Will352 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 2:07 PM
Speaking of gasbags,why do you keep trolling here,rather than doing your oral farting at a lib site that would appreciate the stench?
NewJAl Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 1:56 PM
He did think Romney would win, and was very wrong about the nature of the constituency. They will, with pride and confidence, all smiling smugly at each other, shoot themselves in the foot. There is no free lunch. And if you took all the wealth of our wealthy they would then be poorer and America worse off. 'Socialism is fine until you run out of other people's money' Thatcher
Americans are either stupid or easily bought, or both.
yachtsman388 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 1:50 PM
Another gasbag heard from.

The common stock of the New York Times (NYSE: NYT) plunged from $10.87 last week to a close of $8.19 on Friday after the liberal mouthpiece announced that its 3rd quarter net income dropped 85 percent.

While analysts are blaming soft advertising revenues, I think something more ominous is happening at America’s national, bleeding-heart newspaper.

(Editor's note: I'm taking a few days off. I'll see you guys again on Tuesday with a crop of Email and Hate Mail)

For sure, advertising revenues are dropping nationally as economic conditions have deteriorated over the last two quarters.

Newspapers in...

Related Tags: New York new york times NeW