And you know that what the GAO says ObamaCare will cost is way off of what it really will cost. Like Medicare when it began ended up costing like ten times what the Democrats said it would cost. If ObamaCare is said to be costing 2 trillion, it's really going to cost 10 trillion, or more. In other words ObamaCare will cost more money than America has to spend on anything. I want all the money ordered be put back into Medicare, and the military. And anywhere else Obamb stole it, I want the money put back. Let these Democrats see that what they voted for cannot be paid for no matter what they think they will be able to get the money from. No one is going to give it to Obama no matter what he threatens to do.

The problem will be for state run hospitals that get some of their funding from the government through the state, to go along with the state that declares it's not going to obey the law. What Obama is doing is stealing money from Medicare, the military, and everywhere else he can in order to fund ObamaCare himself, and not depend on Congress passing the funding of the law, which they aren't. Now, what's good is the Democrats are backing out of supporting it themselves because of the pressure they are getting from the medical community from their states. Good! That's what they deserve for backing the stupid thing to begin with. It's caving in on them right in front of their own eyes.

38 states have already declared that ObamaCare will cost to much for them to sustain implamentation of it. Period. My state, Louisiana way back when the whole argument started passed their 10th Amendment bill of states rights that at any time the government dumps a law onto the state that the state cannot pay for now or in the future it has the right to reject it and refuse to obey the law. According to the Constitution if, and I'm guessing on the number, 32 or 36 states declare a bill to costly and unsustainable, the bill is repealed, or something like that. Well 38 states have refused to put together the exchange panels or whatever it's called and have ordered that the government is going to have to do it for them. In other words...

I don't care what O'Reilly says about people who are going by the Bible on this issue. They don't have to go by the Bible, they could use the Koran. As a matter of fact since liberals have this current love affair with Muslims, why don't they just ask a Muslim what they think about "gay's" marrying and see what they tell you. And don't let liberals fool you, Love has nothing to do with this issue of "gay" marrage. It is just another liberal attack on the Christian foundation of this nation. The less this nation is Christian the more this nation losses it's soul. And if Christian's give up fighting this evil, liberal attacks on our Christian faith, we all will suffer God's wrath. As a matter of fact He's been warning us for some time now.

And don't give me this BS that "gays" can raise kids to be "normal". That is impossible because of the fact that a woman cannot teach a boy how to have normal relationships with girls, and a man cannot teach a girl how to have normal relationships with boys. That teaching must come from a man, the father, and a woman, the mother. Mother's teach boys how to be gental and kind, and fathers teach their daughters how to be strong and tough. That way girls turn out normal and boys turn out normal. That is not there is to it of course, but basically that is why parents must be a father and a mother. Just ask a couple of queers, "Who's the mother in the relationship?", "Who's the father?" to a couple of lesbo's. They can't answer that question.

And why not? Because their behavior is sinful and they would not be able to separate that behavior to the children which would cause them to become "gay". Everyone knows that what a child sees is what they learn, even disturbed behavior like being depressed. That comes from depressed parents who the children see not dealing with their depression in a healthy way. And a depressed parent most likely will abuse the children as part of their way of dealing unhealthily with their own depression. That makes the kid depressed. Same thing with "gays".

But that doesn't mean that it is not a psychiatric illness anymore. It just means that legal cases involving homo's and lesbo's cannot be handled like these people are mentally ill and dismiss their claim or whatever. They are still mentally ill people I don't care what other parts of their lives are considered "normal". I my day there was normal behavior and abnormal behavior. It was liberals who changed the "lable" like Justice Roberts is saying liberals are doing to the word marrage that is the issue here, not whether or not "gays" have the "right" to marry. They don't because they are mentally ill with a illness that precludes their use of "moral" upbringing of young whatever way they got them. "Gay's" don't have the right to adopt.

O'Reilly is a blowhard and I don't understand what his problem is. If he's a Catholic then he must not believe in what the church says about the fact that every civilization known to man even current civilizations around the world all honor marrage between one man and one woman, and they all abhore homosexuals as mentally ill people, even perverted and some countries deal with these people harshly. That is every one except Canada, the US, most of the Britains, Australia, and some European countries. That leaves alot of the world that does not accept so-called "gays" as equal to all others in their society. Even in America homosexualality and lesbianism was removed from the Supreme Courts list of psychiatric illnesses in 1961.

So screw the queers and lesbos. I don't care what they want. God gave marrage btween one man and one woman toman so that it would be without "SIN IN HIS EYES". And if you don't like that then to bad.

And what has just now started coming out is what other methods the left are using to collapse the economy which I've been writing about for years is the destruction through the use of "Cloward-Piven" method that overloads the government with benefit programs so much so that eventually it emplodes in on itself from the weight of debt. I have finally started hearing some on the radio start to talk about it but they haven't explained it yet. And if you would like to know who these two guys are look up Professor's Cloward, and Piven from Columbia. As a matter of fact Obama gave a award to Piven I think in the first year of his 1st term for his "economic achievements". Yeah, right!!