Previous 21 - 30 Next
Not my first choice, James, as I have clearly pointed out in multiple posts. I have suggested that we should drop 5 megaton nuclear weapons 20 miles outside Muslim capitals with the threat that the next round of bombs would be 10 megaton dropped 15 miles outsides their capitals, etc. unless they mobilize all their military forces to exterminate the barbaric terrorists in their societies. I have suggested that we threaten to make Mecca and Medina radioactive. I have suggested that the only way to defeat terrorists is to out-terrorize them. Now, you are free to disagree with me...certainly, you have shown your disagreement with the suggestion that we nuke this Syrian base as an example of our resolve to end the insanity. Yeah, you can disagree all the way up to the time that you and your loved ones are told: convert or die. See, I'm willing to turn some sand into glass if that's what it takes to get the oil sheiks to put their own blood and treasure on the line. That's how I'm different than ISIS barbarians; I'm willing to do what Harry Truman did and scare the hell out of an entire nation so as to end the bloodshed...not so I can decapitate more "infidels" or innocent civilians.
Arrows left in the quiver might as well be Q-tips. If the Rules of Engagement are "don't shoot," what good is a rifle? This Syrian army base, now overrun with ISIS barbarians, is a perfect target for a battlefield nuke...about 5 to 10 megaton.
Thomas Jefferson and most of the FF would be horrified by our current state of affairs. Although he is considered to be a "classical liberal," and "Father" of the Democrat party, he would disown the Democrats in a New York minute. TJ would be a member of the TEA Party. He was opposed to a central bank with the power to issue credit and/or currency. He would have railed against the corrupt Senators who brought the Federal Reserve into existence a century ago. And what modern Democrat considers the liberty bestowed to us as American citizens...as TJ did...to be "the gift of God?" Democrats support tyranny, not liberty.
In response to:

Solution for ISIS: Obliterate Them

Whitebeard Wrote: Aug 24, 2014 10:13 AM
Who could argue that we should learn from history? And what military strategist would argue against "obliterating" an enemy? But supposing that the American military...in the form of "boots on the ground"...is the only way to do so is rather 17th century. What happened within days of Hiroshima and Nagasaki being decimated by the first two nuclear bombs? Japan surrendered. What do you suppose would happen if we dropped small nuclear bombs outside...say 20 miles from...every Muslim capital - with a demand that they mobilize their military forces to eradicate the terrorists among them...or face another round of bigger bombs closer to their capitals? What would happen if Mecca and Medina were threatened with nuclear destruction? I'll tell you what would happen. The oil sheiks would have to get up off their azzes and spend their own blood and treasure to preserve any semblance of life as they have known it up to now. The only way to defeat terrorists is to out-terrorize them. Turning some sand into glass should be sufficient to motivate the movers and shakers of Muslim societies to clean up their act and "obliterate" the barbarians among them.
In response to:

First Step for Ferguson

Whitebeard Wrote: Aug 24, 2014 9:47 AM
What gives you the right, Mr. Jacobs, to suppose at this point that you should be "confidant about what happened?" To expect to be "confidant" about the details of a shooting prior to the completion of an investigation, presentation to a grand jury, etc. is rather egotistical, isn't it? Since when does the world owe you immediate and "perfect" knowledge about events that occurred hundreds or thousands of miles away from you?
Since she lives in Chicago, and Chicago is allegedly on the ISIS hit list, I wonder where she will be on 9/11/14? ...other than in a state of confusion, of course.
A racist, sexist, baby-killing, convicted crackhead posts that "hatred and paranoia are all that the GOP has." Please provide evidence that "the world is a safer place" under BHO. That's what he said. OTOH, statistics seem to show that terrorist attacks have increased by 60% since he has been POTUS. Who ya gonna believe...a lying POTUS or facts? Oh, you don't need to answer that; I already know.
What do you mean "Obama Presidency?" He isn't POTUS. Valerie Jerrett is. BHO is the GIF...golfer in chief.
In response to:

Should The U.S. Declare War On ISIS?

Whitebeard Wrote: Aug 23, 2014 11:22 AM
WJF: My response to their demand "convert or die" is "end the terror or die."
In response to:

Should The U.S. Declare War On ISIS?

Whitebeard Wrote: Aug 23, 2014 10:52 AM
What do you think, WJF; maybe it's time that we force the movers and shakers of their societies to do something about it, to change their ways, etc. - see my post, below, for a suggestion.
Previous 21 - 30 Next