In response to:

The Republican Rape Dilemma

Whiff1962 Wrote: Oct 28, 2012 12:51 AM
The govt. has the right to protect life, liberty and property. So how does this duty of the state square with sanctioning abortion? The fact is is that many laws today are not to be justified and supported by the letter of our supreme law, if not its spirit. Modern Progressivism, post 1965, has been marked by a kind of social atmosphere that has all but shorn us of the certitude of right and wrong; good and evil. The decrying of theocratic tyranny has been replaced with that of a state tyranny, albeit soft-peddled and well-meaning.

As Richard Mourdock’s Indiana Senate fate hinges on how voters absorb his views on rape, all conservatives have an opportunity for a look in the mirror.

Just how pro-life do we want to be?

The Mourdock controversy is nothing like Todd Akin’s self-inflicted wound in Missouri, the result of an embrace of just plain bad medical information.

Mourdock is in hot water for accurately (if not particularly skillfully) articulating what God instructs about the life of the unborn.

If he is on politically shaky ground, it is because he had the courage to stand on the...