1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Did the Mid-Terms Really Mean That Much?

Whiff1962 Wrote: Nov 11, 2014 12:51 PM
Who is this "he" to whom you are referencing?
The liberals did not move on up, did they? LMAO
I have come to the ineluctable conclusion that there must be a congenital state of being a liberal, a biological determinism, its seems, in individuals to be drawn to the collective. I cannot explain, otherwise, how a liberal remain liberal his whole life through.
How are we going to make the medicine go down? Springfield is going to be gridlock, I am afraid.
Not of them were Dems, obviously. LOL
In response to:

The Democrats' Achilles' Heel

Whiff1962 Wrote: Oct 31, 2014 11:21 AM
I see the black vote for the party of the govt. plantation, as "identifying" with the party, alright. The black vote is the vote of the tribe, and to my reckoning, is a balkanizing politics that the Democrats excel at.
In response to:

Kaci Hickox, Self-Absorbed Hero

Whiff1962 Wrote: Oct 30, 2014 1:07 PM
It has come to light that this nurse is looking to pick a political fight. This has political hack written all over it.
In response to:

The Harvard 28 to the Rescue

Whiff1962 Wrote: Oct 23, 2014 12:28 PM
God help us all, when these Ivy Leaguers, the "cream of our youth", go forth into the world.
It is so often the case that the left get mired in legalisms. The same goes with "legalizing" marijuana, which means greater govt. control, and a "preferential" law for a select group, while legal sanctions against "outliers", who choose to skirt prohibitionist and "medical" laws (proscribing and prescribing of plant material?!), are rather harsh. Any time liberals speak of "legalization", I read it for what the left implies and intends.
1 - 10 Next