In response to:

Report: Obama Was Briefed on Benghazi Terrorism Connection Days Before Susan Rice's Public Denials

rmt5 in MA Wrote: Nov 19, 2012 11:45 AM
raul: Still dredging up the same old lies concocted about Bush to cover for Obama's trangressions. You trolls are lower than low!
rmt5 in MA Wrote: Nov 19, 2012 11:58 AM
raul: One has to believe the lies about Bush, forget the wall that Jamie Gorelick built and, in general, be a total buffoon to think there is a comparison.
rauljg69 Wrote: Nov 19, 2012 11:50 AM
No just comparing the 2 similar scenarios. You all are clamoring about Obama's incompetence and coverup of his handling of Benghzai and an attaack the killed 4 clear across the world in a small town in a consulate and safe house. I compare it to Bush's incompetence of his handiling of counterterrorism warnings that were not heeded and the killing of over 3,000 US civilians.

Your reaction to the 2 events is VERY releveant. You think 4 being killed is worse then 3,000. You are more outraged about Obama then Bush. You didnt demand what did Bush know and when did he know it ever! Why? Because you are partisan extremist right wing fringe conspiracy theorist that just hate Obama. IF this had happened under McCain there would be no outrage.

Just last week, the president adamantly defended his Ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, who is widely rumored to be a leading contender to replace Hillary Clinton at State.  Rice appeared on all five Sunday morning shows on September 16, five days after the deadly 9/11 attacks.  She advanced three core assertions for public consumption:
 

(1) The the violence had spilled over from "spontaneous" protests over an internet video.  (There were no protests outside of the Benghazi consulate leading up to the...