In response to:

Notorious Anti-Islam YouTube Video Not Mentioned in Clinton Testimony

rmt5 in MA Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 8:41 AM
Since Obama is solely about politics and elections, the video story mattered only BEFORE the election so as to deflect culpability for four deaths away from the Obama administration. Now that the election is over, Hillary can now ask in a rhetorical way "What difference does it make?" These are sleazy people who know how to deceive because it is a way of life for them. To them, the bad people are those who dare to question their wrong doing. Too many Repubs fall into the phony guilt trap laid for them and shun their responsibility to expose these skunks.
Henry VIII Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 8:45 AM
Exactly....the MSM is all over the football player from Notre Dame....but four dead in Benghazi wasn't worth a look see especially if it would have deterred reelecting their messiah.

UPDATE: During Clinton's testimony in front of the House Armed Services Committee Wednesday afternoon, Reps. Dana Rohrabacher, Matt Salmon and Mo Brooks mentioned the anti-Islam film originally blamed for the attack. Clinton danced around the subject by saying the investigation into what happened in Benghazi is ongoing. The best exchange was between Clinton and Brooks:

 

U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens sent multiple requests for more security to the State Department throughout 2012 and cited al Qaeda threats as a reason why it was needed. The extra security was never...