Obama needs to distract from the scandals, so he is going to play President for the Day by giving a national security speech.

Re Benghazi, he was in the process of it until ambushed by Candy Crowley.

Yep. It's time for Carney-val to get his own talk show somewhere. I wonder where? MSNBC, perhaps? Hmmmm?

It's one thing to be stupid....but to do it on National TV. Fortunately, MSNBC has only 37 viewers, so it wasn't as bad as doing it on......um..............let's say, Fox.

corr: Shulman thought it would NOT have been appropriate........

Shulman thought it would have been appropriate to bring up the targeting issue at the White House. If he had concerns about inappropriateness, why didn't he, as THE boss of the IRS, do an investigation of his own? No, instead he let that be the job of the IG, apparently hoping that report wouldn't come out until after the election. I think he DID talk with the White House and that is what they told him to do!

........and why didn't Hubert Humphrey make a big deal out of Watergate when he ran against Nixon?

I've had that problem, usmc. It has happened on two different computers, one with Internet Explorer and the other with Google Chrome.

The Dems keep pointing out that because of Citizens United the number of applications doubled, as if that somehow explains targeting. They don't seem to understand that if the workload increases, you don't add multiple layers of paperwork involving questions never before required for tax exempt status. The more likely response to a heavy workload would be to rubberstamp the applications with little scrutiny.

Why do witnesses say "Not that I remember" about matters that their positions REQUIRES them to remember, or that are so important that not remembering only makes them look foolish?