In response to:

A Solid Romney Win Where It Matters

WfoxT Wrote: Oct 23, 2012 1:00 AM
Join the Marines, huntbutt. They will be glad to show you how to use a bayonet. Wars cannot be won without ground troops and they use bayonets.

When analyzing who won a debate, you can look at a number of factors: Who achieved their overarchhing objective, who had the most memorable lines, who might have left behind ticking time bombs in terms of statements that will return to haunt them.  Looking at any of the three, Romney was the clear winner, and Obama the loser.

Obviously, Romney's overarching objective wasn't to score debate points on Benghazi or Syria.  It was to prove that he is competent, calm, knowledgeable and -- most emphatically -- not a warmonger.  It was to make sure he seemed presidential.  He achieved it.  By...

Saturday, May 18 | 03:36 PM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 03:36 PM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 03:36 PM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 03:36 PM ET