In response to:

Blitz to Rand Paul: Benghazi's the "Worst Tragedy Since 911?"

WesleySteinbrink Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 7:44 PM
There is a difference between following intelligence that seems disproved later (going into Iraq for war) and not following intelligence for political purposes and attempting to cover it up (Bengazi)
Duke Nuk'em Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 8:03 PM
Progs won't be able to comprehend your comment.
WesleySteinbrink Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 8:13 PM
Man, you mean I would have to spell it out more for them?
WesleySteinbrink Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 9:51 PM
not following intelligence ... British moving out, terrorist threat up, etc.
for political purpose ... quotes that "Al Queda was on its heels" had to stand for the election.
attempting to cover it up ... weeks of "It was the video"
WesleySteinbrink Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 9:55 PM
following intelligence ... Weapons of Mass Destruction that were highly portable.
seemed disproved later ... None found.
WesleySteinbrink Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 10:02 PM
Most of this is borne out in this article:

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/01/23/180806/emotional-and-defiant-clinton.html