In response to:

Are Smaller Banks Better for Politics?

Wendy60 Wrote: Jun 25, 2012 7:14 PM
A lawyer, eh? Ah ha. I find it hard to believe that you have clear grudges against both interstate banking and big banks, but you are not in favor of any laws to deal with them. After all, according to you, the results of the former "threaten" the financial system. What conservative even grouses about these imaginary things?

Earlier this week University of Chicago Professor Luigi Zingales offered an interesting, although I suspect commonly held, reason for his conversion to supporting a new “Glass-Steagall.”  For those who don’t follow banking, Glass-Steagall, passed as part of the New Deal, mandated the separation of investment and commercial banking.  This reason?  Professor Zingales asserts that Glass-Steagall “helped restrain the political power of banks.”  More fully, he argues:

Under the old regime, commercial banks, investment banks and insurance companies had different agendas, so their lobbying efforts tended to offset one another.  But after the restrictions ended, the interests of all...

Wednesday, May 22 | 07:56 AM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 07:56 AM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 07:56 AM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 07:56 AM ET