He said:

> the reason for the state to recognize traditional marriage exclusively is to provide incentives for opposite-sex couples to enter into procreative families and raise their children in a socially stable setting.

> Once you realize that THAT is the rational basis for the state’s exclusive recognition of traditional marriage, then virtually all the arguments against it become irrelevant

Hardly. This is an issue about RIGHTS, not INCENTIVES FOR PROCREATION.

Liberals and fascists put the interests of the state ahead of the rights of individuals.

Your entire (non)argument is based upon a fascist ideology. 1930's Germany was real big on that kind of legislation.

"The German state...

http://www.newsweek.com/2010/01/08/the-conservative-case-fo r-gay-marriage.html

This essay was written by Ted Olson, the man who argued the case, and a former U.S. Solicitor General - appointed by GW Bush. (He also served under Reagan, defending him during the Iran-Contra affair.)

The libertarian-leaning JUDGE (Vaughn Walker) was nominated by both Reagan and GHW Bush. (Reagan's nom failed because a group of Dems - led by Nancy Pelosi - fought it, partly because of the nominee's alleged "insensitivity" to gays.)

So, a big thanks to Reagan and both Bushes.

And NO thanks to Nancy Pelosi and...

Israel does represent slaughter - They always have.

Townhall is just a step beneath /b/ lolol

Relize...heh. http://i.imgur.com/Oskby.jpg morons...