In response to:

Why John Roberts is Mitt Romney's Secret Weapon

Weisenheimer Wrote: Jul 01, 2012 12:51 PM
Mr. McCullough, do you put your argument up against people like Mark Levin, who IS a constitutional lawyer, whose Landmark Legal Foundation has worked on this for two years? Mark Levin said that he would hugely shocked and bewildered by what Justice Roberts did. How he could ever sign his name to this "piece of crap" legislation was beyond his comprehension. So if you dispute what Mark Levin said, and stand by what you have told everyone here, then that's on you. I won't accept anyone's explanation except Justice Roberts and he's not likely to say anything. For those of you who think that Mitt Romney will repeal ObamaCare, just keep on dreaming. His words "repeal and replace."

I would caution my fellow conservatives on the frustration they may be enticed to express at Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts. It is unwarranted, and it is unwise.

The reason I state such is that it is my firm belief that the Roberts' decision on the Obamacare mandate will without question bring about ultimate doom to the government control of healthcare, and through the best means possible--not judicial activism--but through the democratic process.

In boxing terminology no one has pulled a "rope-a-dope" this effective since Muhammad Ali himself. In doing so, it is clear that John Roberts duped the liberal...