You seem to be filled with hatred for these groups. Can you cite any "campaign of personal vilification" by any of them? How about anything similar to the "campaigns of personal vilification" the Prop 8 opponents used on those who stood for traditional marriage.? I think you are a hypocrite, and that you lie to yourself, telling yourself that people who disagree with your are haters, and thus deserving of bad things to happen to them.

Just more support for my new found belief that if we prevented liberals and Democrats from buying and owning guns, mass murders would be significantly reduced.

Whenever I saw or have seen the Monti Te'o stuff on the news, I cannot help but question why the press would waste valuable time and resources to cover or write about this non-event. It just reinforces my beliefs about the reason newspapers are dying - lack of competent, worthwhile reporting on meaningful events.

Did anybody check Kroft's blue dress for DNA stains?

Yes, it is what is driving the argument, but shouldn't mature, rational discussion look beyond that? Nobody is saying to forget them. Rather, the issue is that emotionalizing the issue doesn't actually end up solving the problem - it simply raises the temperature but provides no illumination. I didn't realize it was so difficult to understand that a solution is only reached when we can dispassionately use our intelligence and reason to dissect the problem.

The problem with forcing businesses to serve everybody is that Jim Crow laws forced businesses to be segregated. In a free country, the government should have no authority to force any privately-owned business to serve or to not serve anybody of their own choosing. This is really the only constitutionally-consistent view of government power regarding the powers given to it. It is a private business' right to determine who it serves and who it does not. But idiots who believe and support the prominent idiot scumbag Kennedy's view don't seem to grasp that those who discriminate would lose out in the marketplace to those who did not. And it would all happen without the Constitution-violating dictatorial laws pushed by leftist scum.

That's because the government was supposedly the workers government, so a union would be competing against the government as the protector of the workers. However, they are not making unions illegal, just removing the anti-freedom law that forced all workers to join the union just to have a job.

What about things like: - Freedom from propaganda in the classroom - Freedom from being used as political pawns - The right to teachers who can pass the students' tests - The right to be taught using proven teaching methods - The right to have teachers that actually know the subjects they teach

I thought it was pretty obvious that what Buffett is doing here is quid pro quo rent-seeking. He is spouting Obama propaganda on the hopes of getting help with both his company's tax problems and taxpayer money for his "green" energy project (green in quotes because the only thing that is really green about it is the color of the public fisc these rich Obama BFFs receive).

They don't sound like very bright people. Their claims against the GOP are more the result of fevered imaginations and delirium than any rational reality-based thought. A true Confederacy of Dunces.