Join the Debate!
All comments and users are subject to Townhall's new comments policy.
Login in to Post Your Comments
1Falcon1 Wrote: Jan 03, 2013 3:26 PM
bye sybil
Login to Reply
Flag as Offensive
Post Comment
Colonialgirl Wrote: Jan 02, 2013 10:24 PM
Not too bright about military history are you; You probably went to some namby-pamby liberal school where they spoon fed you with the leftist pablum and lies.
Login to Reply
Flag as Offensive
Post Comment
There are More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All
Stratboy Wrote: Jan 02, 2013 6:32 PM
You are assuming that at least half of the military wouldn't join us. I believe they would, and probably more.
Login to Reply
Flag as Offensive
Post Comment
serwin Wrote: Jan 02, 2013 6:32 PM
The vast majority of soldier would refuse to fire on innocent civilians. The USSR found that out the hard way.
Login to Reply
Flag as Offensive
Post Comment
Original Saepe_Expertus Wrote: Jan 02, 2013 6:14 PM
Watkinson...TWO WORDS: Posse Comitatus.
Login to Reply
Flag as Offensive
Post Comment
GodsLaws Wrote: Jan 02, 2013 6:12 PM
Ask the Syian military about the effectiveness of small arms fire. Or the English for that matter.
Login to Reply
Flag as Offensive
Post Comment
Stratboy Wrote: Jan 02, 2013 6:31 PM
Or the Russians and the US who have been fighting the Afghans for 25 years between them,
Login to Reply
Flag as Offensive
Post Comment
Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., in the wake of the Newtown, Conn., shootings, said: "The British are not coming. ... We don't need all these guns to kill people." Lewis' vision, shared by many, represents a gross ignorance of why the framers of the Constitution gave us the Second Amendment. How about a few quotes from the period and you decide whether our Founding Fathers harbored a fear of foreign tyrants.
Alexander Hamilton: "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed," adding later, "If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is...
Why the 2nd Amendment