In response to:

Report: Director of National Intelligence Swiped al Qaeda From Post Benghazi Talking Points

Wallac Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 12:59 PM
I said before and will say again, what does it matter, the focus should be how we prevent such from happening again, not who told the public what at first.
Charles SWVA Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 1:33 PM
Can't we just move on? The eternal plea of those such as Wallac who wish it would just go away and stop embarrasing the Demonrats. It won't.
Nana82 Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 1:52 PM
PCL Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 1:32 PM
Wallace, sweep the dirt under the carpet, and the dirt still stays. Listen to Libs_Are and Nana.
Nana82 Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 1:03 PM
How can you prevent something happening again unless you determine what exactly, how and why it happened in the fist place?
Libs_Are_UsefulIdiots Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 1:02 PM
Wallac: You can say that as many times as you want to, but people STILL NEED to he HELD ACCOUNTABLE.... And they WILL.

We're getting warmer. As Guy pointed out yesterday, General David Petraeus told the White House immediately after the 9/11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi that he believed the attack was carried out by al Qaeda affiliated terrorists. In his memo about the attack, Petraeus used the words "al Qaeda" to explain the situation. When UN Ambassador Susan Rice appeared on five Sunday shows five days after the attack to blame a YouTube video, she didn't refer to terrorism or al Qaeda. After Petraeus' testimony in front of Congress last week, we learned the talking points given to Susan...

Friday, May 24 | 10:36 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 10:36 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 10:36 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 10:36 PM ET