In response to:

Rove Vs. the Tea Party

Vincent107 Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 11:35 AM
Of course the establishment Republicans look at some of the candidates the Tea Party put forward who didn't get elected, and say this is indicative that the Tea Party can have no political traction. However, we never hear the establishment Republicans use the same logic against their own candidates. John McCain was such a lackluster moderate Republican that his campaign was barely on life support until he picked Sarah Palin as his running mate. He still lost. Mittens the Wonderhair was touted as the only candidate who could beat Obama, but he couldn't energize the base. Still, Obama won by only by a slim margin. Obama may have even lost if allowing for the rampant voter fraud in Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania.
Vincent107 Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 11:38 AM
"The Architect's" (of GOP demise) and the establishment's solution is to become more like Democrats. It never occurs to them that if someone is going to vote Democrat-lite, they'll more readily vote for a Democrat. Americans need a viable alternative to statists.
During the 2012 election cycle, Tea Partiers were told by their supposed betters that their ignorance of everyday politics meant that they should take a back seat to the Republican Party establishment. Brandishing the so-called Buckley Rule with quasi-religious fervor -- the notion that Republicans should run the most conservative candidate who can win -- the establishment GOP proclaimed that the only presidential candidate who could win was Republican Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts. They suggested that four-term former Wisconsin Governor Tommy Thompson was a shoe-in for the Senate. They explained that the Tea Party was responsible for failed Senate candidates...
Thursday, May 23 | 01:50 AM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 01:50 AM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 01:50 AM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 01:50 AM ET