The Gay Bullies Are Being Exposed

It's certainly best to keep discussing and studying something. The problem comes in when objective study of something is discouraged and rejected because it doesn't give the desired conclusions.

Should "gays" go back to the "closet"? No. Should they admit that they have a problem and address it (as indeed many have done)? Yes.

I think he might have been referring to those opposed to the LBGT agenda. They are going to be the ones that re-populate the closets.

Thank you for clearing that up. I agree that it is a problem when research doesn't fall in line with desired conclusions. That makes studying the issue all the more important.

How about just back into the privacy of your dwelling for starters? Why must you trumpet your activities to everyone and then force us to accept it? Keep it to yourself.

Homosexuals are now telling us that this is a "settled issue," that we can stop studying the effect of homosexuals' influence on children under their charge. THEY are ones tell us to stop discussing and studying the issue.

homosexuality is an unhealthy,destructive behavior(medically PROVEN),a mental illness(readily apparent),and NOT good for society,any society(recognized over millennia).
it is not to be accommodated,enabled,or encouraged.

Not all societies have condemned homosexuality (research Sparta and some Native American cultures). And even if homosexuality is unhealthy, how unhealthy is it compared to other behaviors that are legal and accepted? Smoking and alcohol consumption is accepted and very destructive. So why single out homosexuality?

And yet, the Spartan culture is non-existant today, while the Native Americans still only exist as pocket cultures - hardly examples of success by any means.

Homosexuality combines the greater likelihood of spreading STDs with a high rate of sexual partners, and with the AIDs virus, that makes it quite a deadly behavior.

Smoking and alcohol consumption are generally and factually recognized as unhealthy behaviors - no one is trying to normalize them or preach that they are "normal, healthy, alternative lifestyles" to children in the captive audience classrooms.

Spartan culture lasted for over 400 years. By most measures, it was successful. Native Americans are a different story. Small pox destroyed them, not homosexuality. But even if what you say about STDs and promiscuity is correct about homosexuals (and there may be evidence supporting this), how many people actually die from it compared to alcohol and smoking? If they're more unheahlthy, why do we allow beer commercials during sporting events?

Native Americans destroyed themselves through the centuries by their constant tribal warfare - that is why they were still basically in the stone age of technology / society by the time the Europeans arrived.

Separating the deaths caused expressly by homosexual activity is about as difficult as separating the deaths caused expressly by marijuana from those related to smoking in general. It becomes even more difficult given the stigma against any mainstream research which might portray homosexuality in a negative light.

So if there's no research to vindicate it, how can you logically make the the conclusion that homosexuality is more harmful? If you don't have the data to back up your statement, then you're just making assumptions and assumptions can be wrong. Would you rather hold onto a belief about homosexuality or would you rather be right about it?

I never said homosexuality is "more harmful" in comparison to alcohol or smoking -that came out of your own head. I simply said it is harmful.

Woops. Guess all those state legislatures banning smoking and restricting alcohol are just bigots.

If we can ban smoking and alcohol, why can't we ban sodomy?

Homosexuals don't want equality or tolerance. They want tyranny. Plain and simple. They don't want acceptance, they want preference. Big Brother is alive and well and living in the heart of USA.

The majority of Hitler's SS was ghey. Go figure.