In response to:

Chuck Todd: If Lincoln Were Dealing with These Republicans, We'd Still Have Slavery

VictusMortuus Wrote: Dec 05, 2012 8:44 AM
Google up Liberia and Lincoln , follow the links to get an understanding of the era and Lincoln.
AmericanLiberal Wrote: Dec 05, 2012 8:48 AM
That is not morally instructive. It is nothing more than one generation wagging its finger at another. All men are products of their time. Lincoln included.

But losers like you reprimand giants like Jefferson, a slaveowner, or Lincoln, a racial separatist. It is actually pretty funny. The lack of historic perspective is sad and funny.
Kuwull Wrote: Dec 05, 2012 9:16 AM
That is why Ron Paul is so hard to take by those on both sides of the aisle. Both sides want to cherry pick their own favorite parts of the Constitution,while ignoring others. If you follow the Constitution to the letter and do what is necessary - amend it - when you want legal change to it's restrictions, then EVERYONE from BOTH sides get's to decide their own fate. WHat we would really end up with, as was wished by the founfders, is STATES inhabited by peoples who agree on how they want to live and a fed government making sure they don't interfere with each other's rights.
Kuwull Wrote: Dec 05, 2012 9:17 AM
I take full credit for all misspellinks and bad grammers.

Not his words, you must understand.  Just a "depressing" observation from a "very smart" White House aide:


Joe Klein -- last seen beclowning himself on Benghazi -- gets a big laugh at this line because it's so true, right?  Republicans are just the worst.  Lincoln would have never been able to handle this bunch of radicals.  Maybe this "very smart" White House source should go re-watch Lincoln, or re-read his history books.  Congressional Republicans were the ones who