In response to:

Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud

Vicki68 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 3:36 PM
When there is more than 100% voter turn out? Yes, there is plenty we can do legally.
Nathan223 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 6:47 PM
"Electoral landslide." Obama was the first President in modern history to win his second term on less electoral college and popular votes than he won his first. Fact.
JamesB. Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 6:33 PM
Kodiak - Yes, the popular vote was close but it was AN ELECTORAL LANDSLIDE. Learn some civics and get back to me.
JamesB. Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 6:32 PM
Nathan223 - Of course the popular vote was close. It was, however, every bit an electoral landslide. But I guess a think tank like yourself doesn't understand the electoral college. It makes total sense, you being a right winger.
Nathan223 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 5:10 PM
Don't expect these evildoers to be consistent. I'm prepared to call them as I see them, and not pretend anymore about it. These townhall trolls and progressive activists are evildoers, plain and simple. They call organized theft, destruction of industry, gay marriage, and abortion good. Woe to them and their foolish Godless ways that ignore the widow and orphan who are supported by these businesses. If they refuse to repent, let them be destroyed with the rod of iron from Psalm 2.
Kodiak5 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 5:03 PM
The part I "don't get" is the part where 48% to 50% is considered a "landslide." You're telling me that if Obama had LOST due to a few critical swing states and there were places that reported over 100% voter turnout and other places that reported 99% of voters voted for Romney, you wouldn't be concerned? You're saying that if you situation were reversed you'd have the same head of steam (how many times have you posted on this thread alone) for us all to just "move on"?
Nathan223 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 4:56 PM
"Electoral landslide." We control the House of Representatives. We only lost the popular vote by approximately the margin the Dems lost it 8 years ago. "Landslide" my but.

By the way, does your last name happen to be "Bryant"? I had a Liberal Democratic friend by that name until he simply refused to continue to talk to me. Why? I don't know.
JamesB. Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 4:49 PM
Blah, blah, blah. You're deluded and incapable of taking responsibility for the conservative tail kicking. What part of electoral landslide don't you get?
JamesB. Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 4:47 PM
Move on, Vicki. You got your tail kicked and you need to prepare for the `14 mid terms. It's a joke how many conservatives refuse to take responsibility for this rout. YOU LOST. IT'S OVER!!
Nathan223 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 3:43 PM
I would agree with you, but the courts are packed with morons who's bread is buttered by the Democratic (*cough* Socialist *cough*) Party. Many of the most powerful judges in our country couldn't tell the difference between right and wrong if good and evil stared them in the face.

There were many factors that hurt Mitt Romney and favored Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election. The Democrats portrayed Romney in the worst light possible; as a wealthy, out of touch millionaire who wanted to return women to the 1800's. The left wing media predictably did everything it could to perpetuate that false caricature. Obama's race was an advantage; voters of all persuasions, particularly minorities, still cannot get over the allure of the first black president. The 47% of Americans on welfare were predisposed to vote for the food stamp president over Romney, wanting the free goodies to keep...