1 - 10 Next
If those on death row were executed one per day (that would mean over 2 years) then some might be deterred from murdering. What is needed is a benchmark. Execute within 6 months of conviction. Many citizens may have ill feelings that they, through the state, are choosing to kill another human. But the convict has chosen to murder. When one violates the law, he is choosing the punishment for that violation. Thus, a murderer is choosing his own execution. So, there is no reason for anyone to feel guilty of executing another. This does not mean that he cannot feel sorrow or pity for the poor unfortunate soul.
Remember, the Obama campaign logo symbolized America going down the drain.
In response to:

The Filmmaker Big Business Wants Silenced

verist Wrote: May 04, 2014 11:45 PM
Illegal immigration is one effect of the abortion issue which is neglected. Abortion has created a labor vacuum. So many abortions has created a need for immigrant labor. If the U.S. born workforce was larger, then the resistance to illegal immigration might be greater.
It seems to me that what is material on this issue is 1st: Why didn't the Administration respond with force to the attack in a country lacking a central government? and 2nd: Why is the Administration so reluctant to assert itself the ME? The motivation behind the attacks are immaterial and debating talking points is a side-show. Talking points not the main event. The attack was taking place and that is all that mattered, and it lasted some hours and the Administration did nothing.
In response to:

Politics Versus Education

verist Wrote: Apr 29, 2014 3:12 PM
Liberal Blacks cannot help but see racism everywhere. Their whole world view comes across as racial. They see racism where it doesn't exist. They accuse others of racism where it is not intended. And they'll be damned if they are going to be forgiving and gracious where racism is not intended. Liberals may speak tolerance and understanding, but it is tolerance for them, not for you. And you better understand them, because they are not going to make the attempt to understand you.
In response to:

How Foreign Is Our Policy?: Part II

verist Wrote: Apr 02, 2014 2:50 PM
Clearly, Obama is guilty of SUBVERSION of the United States, for that is what he meant by "fundamentally changing" the U.S.
In response to:

How Foreign is Our Policy?

verist Wrote: Apr 01, 2014 3:12 AM
The irony, BO and the Liberals will find out too late, is that if the U.S. is not dominant, someone else will be. If we are are not calling the shots, so to speak, another country will, most likely China. Usually there has been one dominant power to keep the world peace, such was the Pax Romana. When it isn't present, there is war among competing powers for dominance. In other words, an "unsafe" world. Precisely the opposite what Liberals want when weakening the US. When China is dominating commerce and politics and finance and military power, then the Liberals will really have something to squeal about.
When Matthews worked for Speaker Tip O'Neill, he had to be constantly reigned in for all the outrageous things he said. Nothing has changed. He still has a screw loose. How can anyone pay attention to this man?
The Smith Act of 1940, still in force, requires all non-U.S. adults over the age of 14 to register with the government and be fingerprinted. So, when is this going to be enforced?
1 - 10 Next