1 - 10 Next
In response to:

How Foreign Is Our Policy?: Part II

verist Wrote: Apr 02, 2014 2:50 PM
Clearly, Obama is guilty of SUBVERSION of the United States, for that is what he meant by "fundamentally changing" the U.S.
In response to:

How Foreign is Our Policy?

verist Wrote: Apr 01, 2014 3:12 AM
The irony, BO and the Liberals will find out too late, is that if the U.S. is not dominant, someone else will be. If we are are not calling the shots, so to speak, another country will, most likely China. Usually there has been one dominant power to keep the world peace, such was the Pax Romana. When it isn't present, there is war among competing powers for dominance. In other words, an "unsafe" world. Precisely the opposite what Liberals want when weakening the US. When China is dominating commerce and politics and finance and military power, then the Liberals will really have something to squeal about.
When Matthews worked for Speaker Tip O'Neill, he had to be constantly reigned in for all the outrageous things he said. Nothing has changed. He still has a screw loose. How can anyone pay attention to this man?
The Smith Act of 1940, still in force, requires all non-U.S. adults over the age of 14 to register with the government and be fingerprinted. So, when is this going to be enforced?
This is NOT A CRISIS. The Crimea has always been Russian. It was Nikita Khrushchev, a Ukrainian, who ceded Crimea to Ukraine in 1954. Russia is just reasserting ownership. BObama may be the Neville Chamberlain on our time, but Putin is not Hitler marching into the Sudetenland.
In response to:

Re-Thinking Income Inequality

verist Wrote: Feb 06, 2014 4:13 PM
In the War on Poverty, Poverty has won. Poverty has been entrenched and expanded. Is income inequality real? We have to ask “unequal to what?” Income is equal to skill, talent, education, effort, hours, output and value to society. The Law of Supply and Demand always applies. One impediment that stands to be removed is barriers of entry into a profession applied by unions.
When are all Black Americans going to realize that Obama is not one of them? Obama does not have ancestors who were enslaved. Obama did not grow up in the inner city, nor in the contiguous 48, but was born to an African national in multi-racial Hawaii and raised in Indonesia. He did not spend his formative years living the American experience and the Black American experience. Obama grew up outside the United States, and without much knowledge of the black culture.
One of my greatest disappointments in the 2012 campaign is that Obama was not asked if he would defend Quimoy and Matsu. He probably does not even know where they are, or where the question comes from.
In response to:

Looking for a Different Sort of President

verist Wrote: Nov 09, 2013 1:16 PM
The first session of the First Congress in 1789 discussed a term-limit Amendment to the Constitution. I don't know why it was rejected, but the proposal is interesting in that it would have limited the President to 8 years in office in a 12 year period. So, in that case Bill Clinton would have been eligible to run again in 2004. Such an Amendment would remove the Lame Duck status of the second term and restore the political caution of the first term.
In response to:

Obamacare, Utopia and The Constitution

verist Wrote: Nov 05, 2013 12:47 AM
The Progressives are, and always have been, anti-Constitutional.
1 - 10 Next