Previous 21 - 30 Next
what you do not take into account is that for Hobby Lobby, the bottom line is not profit. the bottom line is integrity and adherence to beliefs and principles. In this way they seek to bring glory to God.
how come when Dems get called out for something completely assinine, it is called a "gaffe." but when a repub says anything remotely "offensive", they prescription is for them to be tarred, feathered, and run out of town on a rail.
In response to:

The Apostasy of World Vision

Verbivore Wrote: Mar 25, 2014 1:31 PM
Love and Understanding are not the same as endorsing and condoning. If someone wants to insist, for example, that a muddy river is actually salt water, all the belief in the world will not make it so. Love and support do not change facts. And facts are that man does not define marriage. Facts are that man was made for woman. "Destructive things," are choosing to defy God. Love does not allow someone to continue on a destructive path without at least issuing a warning.
In response to:

The Apostasy of World Vision

Verbivore Wrote: Mar 25, 2014 1:07 PM
hmm. less than 20 comments by noon. No breathless headlines on CNN. It appears the consensus is that the gay train has left the station. Babies being incinerated in the UK made not a blip on the news. Putin marching into the Ukraine. Yawn. Obama cedes the internet to foreign powers. no one blinks. We are asleep, and flying fast over the cliff.
In response to:

The Apostasy of World Vision

Verbivore Wrote: Mar 25, 2014 10:26 AM
Thank You Michael Brown. I am horrified by World Visions actions. I can't wrap my head around the twisted logic they needed to use to come to such a decision.
Ok Jay. So you say it is a legal matter. nothing more, nothing less. No morality involved. So some of the babies thrown into the fire are just legal issues. But others are moral issues, and who decides which is which? how is the hospital worker supposed to know? Y'know, Hitler considered extermination to be a legal issue. It was just practical. He had grand and noble visions. he wasn't evil. just trying to make the world a better place, damnit. If it wasn't for all those people that just didn't fit his vision!
ha. A jitterbug? Just hoping he can see the flaws in his logic.
So jaybug, what you are saying is that if the woman WANTS the blob of tissue. It is a baby. It she does NOT want it, then it is a fetus. If it is a fetus, all methods of destruction are morally right. If it is a BABY, then careful destruction must be considered. Right? So then, the feelings, beliefs, and wants of the mother are the only gauge of morality? Nothing can be higher or lower than her understanding. Is that correct?
viability. Oh good. At least you have some moral framework. And as viability becomes earlier and earlier, does that mean that what was right is now wrong? Nothing fixed, eh?
so? What's your point. You yourself say it's just "meat."
Previous 21 - 30 Next