1 - 10 Next
The fact is, if one reason is wrong, then all reasons are wrong, and that is something the Abortion crowd can NOT afford to admit.
it seems an odd bill. To oppose abortion on the basis of sex, is to ascent that the "fetus" is actually a person. A child is a "girl" or a "boy." In the animal and plant kingdom we have male and female, but PERSONS are Boys and Girls. A person. With potential. With a future. Also, to oppose on the basis of sex, says there are good reasons and bad reasons for aborting. so it becomes a slippery slope. If a bad reason, "i don't like her sex." Then what is a good reason? "I'm too busy? " And, What are some other bad reasons over which the public is willing to raise it's hackles? "I don't like the hair color." "I don't like the father." "i don't like the shape of her face." (Cont.)
Does he really have nothing better to worry about? Mayor of NYC. And he's worried about how much sugar!? Drugs, murder, theft, city planning, apparently he's got all these issues covered.
ha! didn't connect this...he claim to "know more" on the same day he referenced the "polish death camps." astounding. He's got Chutzpah!
carter was a sunday school teacher and would have studied jewish history. i daresay reagan, bush 1 and 2, clinton, ford, johnson, etc, also ,"read about it." how does that make him more knowleagable? he holds no degree in jewish history...he has not facts to support such an incredibly audacious claim. if he truly knows "more," it is because coming from a muslim heritage, he has been fed a steady diet of jewish hatred. he "knows" about it, because he they are the enemy.
hmmm. So the VP of PP claims to be opposed to "gender-bias" abortion. Why? I find that shockingly hypocritical. Doesn't opposition to "gender-bias." (Let's call it what it is...sex selection), contradict everything PP purports to believe. I didn't realize the organization was such a walking contradiction. It will collapse within under the weight of it's own guilt.
Right. Worldwide. But this is the U.S. PP doesn't care one way or t'other. It's just a blob and they vainly attempt to remain "morally neutral."
The impact of the video is that the public is forced to recognize that deep down, they know abortion to be wrong. If it's wrong got kill a girl for being a girl, then is wrong to kill a baby for being a baby. This video confronts the viewer with the idea that it's not just a "baby." but a "boy baby." A "girl baby." A SOMEONE with potential, a future, an identity. And as far as we've fallen, that jars us back to truth. PP recognized this too, and admitted as much in firing the first woman. Thereby acknowledging that after all, it is life, and some life should be sacred. But which life? whose life?
It's really not a "war on little girls." Wouldn't matter if she said she wanted to abort if it was a boy. PP has to be "non-judgmental." otherwise they couldn't stay in business. Everyone does "What is right in his own eyes."
1 - 10 Next