In response to:

Twisting the Internal Polling Knife

vclaire Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 8:10 PM
Of course there was obvious voter fraud. It is impossible to have 100% of votes for Obama in Philly. No matter what someone would have at least voted for Romney by mistake. And in Florida and Ohio, more people voted that were registered.
pow1000 Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 8:24 PM
In CO 140% voted for 0bama. Figure that one out.
We are now officially a banana republic!
Drifter33 Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 8:18 PM
The left clearly does not want to hear that. Their messiah "won", after all.

I now advocate bio-metric voter ID--your retinal scan om file at a central location in your state. You get to vote--ONCE--if you are alive and bring your own eyes to the polls.
50ShadesOfGreg Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 8:16 PM
Real men own it; crybabies make excuses.

In light of the revelation that Mitt Romney was "shell-shocked" by his loss last week, I've been pretty tough on the job performance of his campaign's internal pollsters, who clearly missed the mark -- resulting in costly tactical decisions down the stretch:
 

These analyses [of the "expand the map" strategy] make sense, but only within the context of the campaign truly believing that they were safe in other crucial must-have states -- a cataclysmically wrong assumption. When I stopped by Romney headquarters in Boston back in September, Newhouse said his team was anticipating a...