In response to:

Democrats: Wisconsin's Recall Election Doesn't Really Matter, You Know

ValerieParneau Wrote: May 30, 2012 10:59 AM
I know if this guy's laughing then President Obama is winning. There's an established pattern, you dig? LOL
Petrus64 Wrote: May 30, 2012 12:30 PM
Wake up from your month's long stupor Val?

I will be looking forward to your Intellectual "Yawns" during the coming weeks.

Speaking of chess...Walker has played the game well. Meanwhile your dumbcrats have wasted millions of dollars on the checker board...
ValerieParneau Wrote: May 30, 2012 11:52 AM
NOTW arguably the dumbest and most dense poster on townhall. Nice to see things haven't changed in his sad myopic little word.

Looks like he just lost another race playing checkers when the game is chess! As his temper goes up his IQ goes down. Better watch out or he'll start stuttering about the "Weimar Republic."

There you don't have to post anything again for weeks!

You're welcome!

Petrus64 Wrote: May 30, 2012 11:18 AM
What are you? some beatnik hippy still stoned from the 60s?

Or maybe Little O's Licker back with a new name for a new day?

My, how time flies. Is seems like just yesterday that Wisconsin Democrats suffered consecutive electoral setbacks, only to press forward with their costly recall effort against Scott Walker, undeterred.  Now the big day is less than a week away, and liberals are already explaining why whatever happens won't really matter all that much:

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) insisted in a television interview that a loss for the Democratic candidate in the recall, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett, wouldn’t have any...