In response to:

Which Babies Should Get the Death Sentence?

Valerie121 Wrote: Aug 22, 2012 8:52 AM
Mr. Akin didn't make a gaffe and he didn't misspeak. He said something completely ignorant and stupid and on that basis alone he isn't qualified to represent anybody. But I'm sure he's loving the attention. He tried to parse rape, which is completely ignorant. he only legitimate reasons for a woman to have an abortion is rape, incest, or when the life of the woman is endangered.
shubi_ Wrote: Aug 22, 2012 9:14 AM
Valerie is another commie troll.
flagged for lying
AliveInHim Wrote: Aug 22, 2012 9:11 AM
So you think that a child conceived in less than ideal circumstances should be torn to pieces, chemically burned to death, or have his skull punctured and his living brains sucked out?

Is that what you believe, Valerie?

Americans witnessed a remarkable drama this week when some of our most exalted politicians frantically scrambled to reassure voters that they, too, believed that the United States ought to permit the deliberate killing of at least some innocent human beings.

They apparently did so to persuade the public they are caring, compassionate and -- above all -- reasonable people.

The drama started when Rep. Todd Akin, the Republican nominee in the U.S. Senate race in Missouri, expressed his view that no innocent human being ought to be deliberately killed.

However, that was not the only thing Akin expressed....