In response to:

So Fake It’s Real: Global Warming is Reality TV for the Media Elite

Vader!*#% Wrote: Apr 24, 2012 9:55 AM
Ask any of the Global Climate Change folks if they can explain the Medieval Warming period in terms of man made effects. So far I have not found one who can. If you don't know what that was look it up. The whole man made climate change thing is another "expert" hoax. Remember Y2K? Its the Sun, stupid.
shubi_ Wrote: Apr 24, 2012 9:57 AM
I would like an explanation of the ice age and the Maunder minimum, too, insofar as greenhouse gas is concerned. What took the carbon dioxide out of the air?
Lazy-J Wrote: Apr 24, 2012 11:05 AM
Colder water absorbs more CO2. We are on a world 75% covered by water. That's a lot of absorbtion. Water absorbs gas from the gas cover in direct proportion to the partial pressure of the gas and inverse proportion to the temperature of the water (above freezing). That is taught in High School Physics. Oh, I forgot, kids no longer have to study Physics, Biology, Math or even English in our high schools. They are forced to study Women's, LGBT, Rainbow Color diversity. God forbid one of the students should learn something useful. The big hoax is to provide for more government control of our lives.
Lazy-J Wrote: Apr 24, 2012 11:12 AM
Since the atmospheric pressure is 14.7 psia at sea level and today's CO2 concentration has increased from 250 ppm to 375 ppm, the partial pressure of CO2 has increased from 0.004425 psia to 0.0066375 psia it is insignificant to the oceans.
Doug3370 Wrote: Apr 24, 2012 11:25 AM
The Maunder minimum did not involve any meaningful change in CO2 concentration. The sun itself became just a tad less bright for a century or so. That happens when the sun, for whatever reason, takes a vacation from having sunspots.

There are other factors at work on our climate than CO2. It's just that CO2 is one of the factors, and it's the one we have some control over, and the current trend is fixing to make trouble for us.

Here’s my challenge to all the global warming apologists:

Explain to me why the “settled science” of global warming has to manipulate headlines to make information appear scarier and more threatening than the actual data shows. If global warming is so settled, why do you and your friends take the opportunity to exaggerate, obfuscate and slant every piece of news that comes out to make it seem relevant to today?       

You can see an example of this in the headlines below:

Climate Change Main Contributor to Corn Volatility, Study Says” writes Bloomberg-BusinessWeek. “

Related Tags: Global Warming TV
Saturday, May 25 | 07:06 PM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 07:06 PM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 07:06 PM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 07:06 PM ET