Good thing we convict people on what the PROSECUTION CAN PROVE and not what idiots like Lambro "believes". If Lambro had his way, we would be convicted people every single day since you would have to prove YOUR INNOCENCE rather than the Prosecution prove your guilt.
In the Zimmerman case, unlike the tall tale Lambro spins, there was NO PROOF of anything other than SELF DEFENSE. PERIOD. Following vs. stalking, eh Lambro? A FAR different scenario and the ONLY one the Prosecution could prove- which is NOT against the law. Otherwise EVERY Walmart shopper would be in prison.
Same Libtard bull from another wannabe SLIMY LIBERAL.