ruffn3k Wrote:
Jun 19, 2013 12:29 PM
They didnt seem to realize what they were promoting, if we cannot base marriage laws on public morality, then how on earth can we ban incestuous or polygamous relationships? The Supreme Court seemed to realize that this was not a decision on SSM unmarriages but it would effect many other unions as well, if they were to attempt to place a special ammendment for homosexuals to marry based solely on their sexual preference, then any other sexual preference could sue for discrimination, you cant say to one group "you get special privelages" but then tell another "naw, your still too disgusting, were not ready for you yet."