hal_incandeza Wrote:
Apr 27, 2013 7:19 AM
Ransom writes "The word “signature” here is key. A signature—not a stamp or autopen—means that Clinton must have seen and signed the cable personally." He is totally wrong. As the Washington Post fact checker notes, Ransom has no idea of what a "signature" is in cables. WaPo goes on to say "At this point, Issa (Ransom) has no basis or evidence to show that Clinton had anything to do with this cable — any more than she personally approved a cable on proper e-mail etiquette. Four Pinocchios. Of course Ransom will dismiss this because it comes from WaPo-- but the reporter spent 9 years covering the State department. Or maybe because it comes from factually-based reporting--you know how much he hates that.