jfhdsiu Wrote:
Apr 02, 2013 1:18 AM
Continued... "(since you seem unable or unwilling to address the point of the column which is centered around the words "Jesus never said anything about homosexuality. EVER!")." Since the article set the precedent of "Don's" addiction to marijuana as being the cause of his failures, which is a canard, it logically follows that everything said after that is 'moot' due to the precedent of a false 'premise' previously being set. So why should I even address it as it has nothing to do with the premise I've been speaking about?