The Ryan budget accelerates spending TOO. It never balances either -- in the real world. It only balances if a lot of highly unrealistic assumptions are made and if Congress does not decide to spend more over the next decade or so.
We need real cuts in federal spending -- not just cuts in projected growth. Ron and Rand Paul both introduced budgets that balanced in the real world last year. (Ron's in 3 years and Rand's in 5.) Both made actual cuts to federal spending. Of course neither party would consider either of these budgets.
When will people learn that there is no difference between the two parties?