Jimbo124 Wrote:
Mar 11, 2013 2:04 PM
Kind of makes you wonder why the anti-gun nuts vehemently oppose armed security protection for the proven-to-be vulnerable "gun-free zones" such as schools. Could it be they want atrocities to continue in order to achieve their political/philosophical goal of a total gun ban? I believe there are court cases which concluded that the police are not required to protect you, so they usually only arrive in time for the body count. As a demonstration of good faith, I think POTUS and other advocates of disarmament should henceforth forego armed security for their own precious selves.