AliveInHim Wrote:
Mar 09, 2013 5:55 PM
What exactly is the moral basis upon which it is considered right for a third party to forcibly interfere with the negotiations between an employer and his employee? A thing is worth what it is worth because of what people are willing to pay for it. The mail clerk isn't paid the same as the CEO because it isn't the mail clerk's money which is at risk nor his knowledge of the business which is responsible for its existence and growth-and if the mail clerk could DO what the CEO does, he would no longer be the mail clerk! Let the employer and his hire determine the worth of the labor.