DD: The scenario you outlined is why we need a clarification of the admin's position on this issue.
There need to be protocols in place & Constitutional Principle needs to be paramount--an imminent
threat is one thing, but executing a 16 year old American citizen by drone, simply because his father
is deemed a threat to our national security, IMHO, is clearly a violation of the 4th & 5th Amendment
rights of that 16 year old citizen, regardless of whose sovereign territory he was on at the time.