What cellphone? The kid brought a camera in. If the kid had used a cellphone, which would have made sense, by the way, then he would have been a lot less conspicuous. Also, clearly the teacher did not think that the kid was a security risk since he was not even sent out of class and the camera was returned to him immediately. This article is all hearsay. There is no information from anyone who was actually there to witness the incident. There are so many holes in this story that it basically boils down to a bunch of bs. What kid would wait 5 days to tell his parents about a teacher acting like this? This article depicts the teacher as an anti-gun fanatic, and yet he just let the issue go and didn't report it to anyone? Just doesn't add up.