Dante9 Wrote:
Mar 01, 2013 4:33 PM
Your definition of marriage has nothing to do with what how Federal Courts have already and the Supreme Court will eventually rule on the constitutionality of marriage as currently defined by some state laws and by DOMA itself. Your opinion of homosexuals is protected by the very same Constitution, despite its bigotry and unevolved denounciations. Any antigay label fits you quite well, Camberbisquit, given the thousands of times you get a big hard-onb over the opportunity to fruitlessly rebut the sane counter-arguments and support for gay rights that are expressed here by people like me who know it is all just a matter of time when editorials like Turek's, and comments like yours, are long just relics of an ugly past.