When you discuss the ideas brought forward by an individual you should really take a close look at the person coming up with the ideas.
Now everyone says you shouldn't attack the person, just attack the message. Usually I would agree, but in this case the person in question does attack others and, as of late, acts very much like those who he is supposedly at war with.
I have personally met Dr. Adams and although he is a talented noise maker I seriously doubt the idea that he is any sort of intellectual. I supported him for several years, but recently decided to test him by challenging him directly. The result of my test was clear. Dr. Adams is immature and posses a fragile over-inflated ego. Are his ideas worth our attention?