Brian953 Wrote:
Feb 21, 2013 3:41 PM
Though such a mentality might do just that, seeing a probelme and pointing it out is insufficient evidence for alleging that the writer is attempting to tap into that result. That you think he might be sort of puts you in the realm of possibly being a conspiracy nut job — it is insufficient evidence to establish that, but it does open the door. I'm thinking you might want a little more benefit of the doubt than you afforded to Jerry Newcombe.