Just a few comments on your muddle-headed argument:
1. if you really respected and understood the Constitution, you would actually respect and understand the Constitution,
2. "militia" does not mean the same thing today as it meant at the time of the writing, and you must remain faithful to the intent of the writing, not your arbitrary manipulation of definition, and
3. if you base you argument on the fact that weaponry has changed, I assume you think the freedom of the press only applies to broadsheets produced on a mechanical printing press.