One further note:
While Chapman glibly pontificates "Until 2008, the Supreme Court had never interpreted it to protect an individual right to own or use guns for self-defense.", he conveniently omits three crucal facts.
First, he deceitfully omits the fact that the question was not even RAISED during the first TWO CENTURIES this country existed. Until the gun grabbers started depriving citizens of their rights , the courts saw no NEED to explain the patently obvious.
Second, he cleverly omits the fact that the ruling came in a case which revolved around the notion that private homeowners HAD no Second Amendement right to own a gun.